Once upon a time, “trauma” meant you got impaled by a javelin. Or, if you were particularly unlucky, trampled by a chariot. It was a word for flesh torn and bones shattered—wounds you could point at while screaming. Fast forward a couple millennia and now, apparently, forgetting your tote bag at Whole Foods qualifies as trauma. We've come a long way.
This isn't to deny that some people go through hell—war, rape, abuse, systemic violence, colonial genocide. But something strange has happened since the 1980s: trauma went mainstream, got medicalized, got monetized, and eventually got so bloated it now covers everything from witnessing war crimes to being left on read.
Welcome to the Trauma-Industrial Complex, where every slightly uncomfortable moment can be interpreted as a diagnostic event and every memory is a potential lawsuit against your own psyche.
War, What Is It Good For? (Apparently, Diagnosing Everyone)
The birth of modern trauma discourse is often traced to Vietnam veterans returning from a brutal, unpopular war with no parades and a surplus of nightmares. PTSD was coined in 1980, not just as a diagnosis, but as a political concession to soldiers who were breaking down in droves. Activists—many of them veterans and feminists—pushed for it. And rightly so. The world needed a vocabulary for psychic pain that couldn’t be dismissed as cowardice or hysteria.
But the inclusion of PTSD in the DSM-III also marked a new era: the bureaucratization of suffering. Once trauma had a billing code, it could be monetized. And once it was monetized, well, you know what happens next—diagnostic expansion. What was once a clinical response to war, rape, or catastrophe got repackaged for middle-class malaise.
From Shell Shock to TikTok
Trauma’s semantic stretch has been Olympic in its reach. In the span of a few decades, it migrated from the trenches of WWI to the yoga mats of Brooklyn. “Trauma-informed” became a lifestyle brand. Your dog trainer is trauma-informed. Your HR policies are trauma-informed. Your sourdough starter has abandonment issues.
Of course, there are still clinicians doing real, gritty work helping survivors of horrific abuse. But they now operate in an ecosystem where everyone is encouraged to “find their trauma.” And if they don’t have one, don’t worry—they probably repressed it. There’s a whole cottage industry dedicated to uncovering the “traumas you didn’t know you had,” like Pokémon cards from your unconscious.
The Paradox of Safety Culture
What began as a movement for validating unspeakable suffering has paradoxically left us with a generation more fluent in pathology than in pain tolerance. In schools, universities, and the workplace, “trauma” now justifies trigger warnings, speech codes, and even the restructuring of curricula. It’s not that people don’t suffer—it’s that we increasingly treat suffering as inherently incapacitating.
Ironically, this therapeutic worldview creates exactly what it claims to oppose: fragility. When every slight is a scar and every discomfort is a wound, life becomes unlivable. And people become deeply vulnerable to authority, because they are trained to seek external regulation for internal distress.
Some call this the rise of the “snowflake.” But that’s too easy. Snowflakes melt. This is more like the rise of the Trauma Entrepreneur—a creature fluent in the currency of psychic pain, collecting diagnoses like NFTs, and wielding their inner child like a cease-and-desist letter against accountability.
The Political Problem with Personal Pain
The real kicker? Trauma-talk often depoliticizes the very things it emerged to name. Racism, poverty, patriarchy, war—these are not merely traumatic experiences, they are systems of oppression. But once filtered through the lens of psychiatry, they get privatized: “your trauma” instead of “our struggle.” You get therapy instead of solidarity. A treatment plan instead of a protest.
Global aid agencies have also latched on. “Trauma counseling” is now a line item in every humanitarian crisis—even when local populations have their own, culturally specific ways of grieving and healing. Western trauma discourse, packaged with good intentions, becomes a form of soft imperialism.
Reclaiming Agency Through Resilience (Without Gaslighting Yourself)
So where does that leave us?
We need a more nuanced map of human suffering—one that allows for both real trauma and the reality that not all pain is pathological. We need to tell our kids (and ourselves) that life is hard sometimes, and that’s not a diagnosis. That resilience isn’t toxic positivity. It’s a muscle—one we build when we encounter adversity, not when we run from it screaming “I’m triggered!”
Let’s honor trauma where it exists, but stop fracking our memories for trauma oil in the name of self-discovery. Let’s stop fetishizing fragility and start investing in meaning-making, agency, and collective strength.
Because at the end of the day, not every bad thing that happens to you is trauma. Sometimes it’s just Tuesday.
🪴 Read this and felt personally attacked? You might be eligible for a diagnosis. Or maybe you just need a walk.